Friday, February 3, 2017

Brexit proves that some issues should not be decided by referendum.




Despite the fact that the EU has for more than five decades been a guarantee for the peaceful coexistence of the different states on this formerly war-shaken continent, the British population has now voted for leaving the European Union. After the result of the vote became publicly known, great numbers of the population obviously were shocked by this development which nobody would have predicted. It became clear, that the vote had been more about emotions than about facts, since Google recorded the phrase “What is the EU?” as the most numerous search-request in the hours after the vote*. Most of the voters were neither aware of the economical nor the political consequences their vote would have for their country – which they cannot even be blamed for. They were made the pawns in a highly emotionally conducted debate by the political leaders, especially the populist parties appealing to the voters’ anxieties. As a matter of fact, most common people would prove unable to cope with so complex an issue, this is exactly the reason why in a democracy representatives are elected. Their duty is to employ their knowledge and their education in order to govern the country in a most sensible and democratic way – at least idealiter.
Therefore the question whether some issues should not be decided by referendum in my opinion should definitely be answered “yes” since it takes more than emotional sensitivities to control a nation’s fate.
* cf. Zadie Smith
 (238 words) 

by Anja Reuer


No comments:

Post a Comment